Department of Justice is now the Department of Communities and Justice.  Find out more >

cjb122.pdfcjb122 
 AuthorStephen Goodall, Richard Norman and Marion Haas 
 PublishedSeptember 2008 
 Report typeCrime and Justice Bulletin No. 122 
 SubjectCosts of crime, Drugs and Drug Courts, Prisons and prisoners 
 KeywordsDrug Court, prison, cost-effectiveness, coerced treatment, substance abuse 
  
 

Download this publication

  
Full report (pdf)

Summary

Aim

Aim
The aim of this report was to estimate (1) whether changes have increased or decreased total costs to the NSW Drug Court and what these changes tell us about the likely cost-effectiveness of the NSW Drug Court, and (2) whether the Drug Court is likely to be cost-effective relative to conventional sanctions in terms of reducing future offending.

Abstract

Abstract
An initial evaluation of the NSW Drug Court found that it was more effective than prison in reducing recidivism but only marginally more cost-effective than prison (Lind et al. 2002). Several changes have since been made to improve its cost efficiency. The aim of this report was to estimate (1) whether these changes have increased or decreased total costs to the NSW Drug Court and what these changes tell us about the likely cost-effectiveness of the NSW Drug Court, and (2) whether the Drug Court is likely to be cost-effective relative to conventional sanctions in terms of reducing future offending. While the methodology employed could not unequivocally determine whether the overall cost of the court had changed, the NSW Drug Court program does appear to be a cost-effective use of resources. The current findings estimate that the Drug Court program provides a net saving of $1.758 million per year when compared with conventional sanctions.