Department of Justice is now the Department of Communities and Justice.  Find out more >

cjb81.pdfcjb81 
 AuthorSteve Moffatt, Don Weatherburn and Jacqueline Fitzgerald 
 PublishedFebruary 2004 
 Report typeCrime and Justice Bulletin No. 81 
 SubjectBail / Remand, Driving offences, Sentencing 
 Keywordsdrink-drivers, dismissals, conditional discharges, prescribed concentration of alcohol (PCA), sentencing 
  
 

Download this publication

  
Full report (pdf)
  
Media release

Summary

Aim

Aim
This study shows that the use of dismissals and conditional discharges for PCA offences has increased sharply over the last ten years, across each of the three PCA offence ranges

Abstract

Abstract
The imposition of a mandatory period of licence disqualification does not apply to charges for driving a motor vehicle with more than the prescribed concentration of blood alcohol (PCA) that are dismissed or conditionally discharged under section 10 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act (1999) or which, prior to 1999, had been similarly dealt with under section 556A of the NSW Crimes Act (1900). This study shows that the use of dismissals and conditional discharges for PCA offences has increased sharply over the last ten years, across each of the three PCA offence ranges. The rate of use of dismissals and conditional discharges in relation to PCA offences, however, varies markedly across Local Courts. Multivariate logistic regression modeling shows that this variation persists even after allowance has been made for the simultaneous effects of age, gender, PCA offence type, whether or not the offender had a prior conviction for a PCA offence and whether or not the sentencing court had the option of referring an offender to a traffic offender program.